• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Spencer Critchley

  • Home
  • About
  • Media Appearances
    • Broadcast Appearances
    • Print & Web Coverage
    • My Reporting & Commentary
    • Podcast
    • “Saving Democracy” Events
    • News: Real or Fake?
    • Hallmarks of a #BadArgument
  • Music
  • Photos
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Politics & Society

Will Democrats Lose Big in November? Only if They Choose to

September 23, 2010 by Spencer Critchley

Written with Zach Friend for the Huffington Post. No ballots have been cast for November’s election, but apparently the outcome has already been decided: it isn’t whether Democrats will lose seats, it’s how badly they will be creamed. The talking heads have declared it so. But you know, political pundits and have a lot in common with stock analysts: they’re pretty good at explaining the future — right after it happens.

Electoral corrections happen. That’s a fact. And this midterm election will have a correction. But will November bring Democratic doomsday? That’s up to voters — and to Democratic candidates, who need to stop trying so hard not to lose that they forget how to win.

There is a roadmap to Democratic victory in November, and it’s simple: establish an emotional (and true) narrative, draw contrasts and let your field operations do their job.

Establish a Narrative

Republicans want to frame this election as about failed policies. It isn’t. But the moment Democrats start justifying — or worse, running from — their policies, that’s the moment they start losing, by leaving a void for the Republican narrative to fill.

It does not matter that the GOP’s narrative is false. What matters is that it carries an emotional punch.

For example: Have you ever heard a Republican refer to Democratic economic policies without using the phrase “job-killing”? Can you think of the Democratic counterpart of that phrase?

Neither can we.

We’re not saying Democrats should come up with something equally dishonest. We don’t need to. Democrats, now and in the past, have a far better record on job creation, and on the economy generally. (Go back and check the record: jobs, GDP growth, debt reduction, all better under Democrats, going back as far as these things have been measured. Do most people know that? Why not, do you suppose?)

No, we can and should come up with our own emotionally powerful but true narrative – and push it boldly.

Recently, President Obama has gained some traction by calling out the GOP for “holding middle class tax cuts hostage” to tax cuts for the rich. This phrase works. Why? Not because it is rationally persuasive (though it is), but because of the emotionally vivid image of being held hostage. That image captures the feeling of the situation — and feelings are what motivate people, not facts and logic.

Draw Contrasts

Starting around the New Year, the DNC started distributing a graph showing the V-shaped curve of job loss vs. job rescue under Bush and Obama, respectively. We’ve heard it called the “bikini graph”, since it’s shaped like a pair of bikini bottoms (or it was, before the recent eight months of job growth extended the right hand side of the V up past the waist band). Now “bikini graph” — there’s an image that sticks in your head.

But many Democrats seem to be uncomfortable with this level of simple, direct emotion. It’s like somewhere along the line we went from the party of shoot-from-the-hip working people to the party of repressed eggheads who’ve lost touch with their lower chakras.

The bikini graph makes a stark, visual contrast between the policies of the two parties. That’s important, because an election is a choice. People need to see the choice, and — say it together — feel it.

Let Your Field Ops Do The Walking

Now here’s where we get to the nuts and bolts. The pundits, as so often happens, are misreading the polls (think back to their record in 2008). Furthermore, and probably because most of them have never actually worked on a political campaign (or at least a winning one), they’re ignoring the power of field operations.* In a recent Politico/George Washington University poll Democrats and Republicans were tied nationally – while in the Midwest and Northeast, home to a number of tight races, Democrats hold a five-point advantage. According to Pollster.com, since the 2008 Election more voters have left the Republican Party than have left the Democratic Party.

We’re not blind to the fact that there is an enthusiasm gap between the two parties. But it doesn’t mean that losing big is the necessary result. Especially given the tightening of state-by-state polling, a lot will hinge on field operations.

Good field ops can make up 3-5 points on Election Day. Organizing for America, the offshoot of Obama for America, has, rightly, been concentrating on voter registration efforts, field training and fundraising in most battleground areas. It’s up to Dems to turn out their voters, using their superior field operation and voter registration edge.

It’s way too early to wave the white flag (actually, it’s always too early for that). If you want to reach voters, give them a reason to care — a good narrative. If you want them to understand what’s at stake, draw contrasts. And if you want them to show up, get your people out in the field. To have a better November, maybe we simply need to pay a little less attention to pundits and a little more attention to what we know in our guts is right — and what we know works.

*Michael Dukakis predicted the critical importance of field organizing in 2007, and we remember TV pundits gently mocking him, because, you know, Dukakis wasn’t cool. But he was exactly right.

Filed Under: Politics & Society

Koran-Burning Coverage: The Hollowness of “Storytelling” as a Journalistic Value

September 16, 2010 by Spencer Critchley

Written for the Huffington Post: It’s Journalism 101: You have to have a story. Who’s the protagonist? Who or what are they up against? And most importantly, what does it mean?

It’s been a foundation of reporting for so long that it’s come to seem self-evident. But is it?

Story-telling, let’s remember, is the essence of fiction. But reality, as most of us live it on most of our days, is precisely not fiction. There is no narrative arc. Nothing ends up meaning anything. Stuff — even if it’s big stuff — just happens.

If you want to get a story out of that, you have to pluck out characters and events and fit them into some kind of order. You have to act, in other words, not as a reporter, but an author.

And so we get the invention of Terry Jones. In reality, Jones appears to be an obscure bigot with about 50 deluded followers. But in the media, Jones has become the world-famous protagonist of a parable of religious intolerance. (Not to mention the proximate cause of some number of deaths, already suffered or yet to come.)

The only reason for this is that, in a slow month for news, and with the nation gripped by the “Ground Zero Mosque” controversy (itself rife with fictional elements), Jones’ threatened Quran-burning made for a good story. Jones, you see, supposedly expresses an emotional truth about “America and Islam” — an emotional truth that somehow trumps the fact more than 300 million other Americans apparently had no plans to burn Qurans on 9/11. [Read more…] about Koran-Burning Coverage: The Hollowness of “Storytelling” as a Journalistic Value

Filed Under: Communication, Journalism, Politics & Society

The “Ground Zero Mosque”: The Perfect Republican Talking Point

September 12, 2010 by Spencer Critchley

Written for the Huffington Post:In the last post Zach Friend and I wrote, we detailed the recipe for a Republican Talking Point. In the short time since then there has appeared a perfect example: the “Ground Zero mosque.”

It isn’t at Ground Zero, it isn’t a mosque, and the xenophobia aimed at it is shameful.

But that hasn’t stopped this talking point from being repeated millions and millions of times. Try Googling it. As of this writing, it yields 105 million hits.

Now trying Googling the more accurate “Islamic cultural center” plus “Ground Zero.” I get 2.9 million hits — a Talking Point-to-Truth ratio of more than 36 to 1.

But remember, a xenophobic frenzy has been whipped up over the idea of peaceful Muslims practicing freedom of religion two big Manhattan blocks from Ground Zero. Without that frenzy we wouldn’t be getting even 2.9 million hits. Probably more like the 345,000 hits that come up for “Islamic cultural center” and “Los Angeles.”

That makes a Talking Point-to-Truth Ratio of … about 300 to 1. [Read more…] about The “Ground Zero Mosque”: The Perfect Republican Talking Point

Filed Under: Communication, Politics & Society

Have Democrats Lost The Narrative?

August 20, 2010 by Spencer Critchley

By Zach Friend & Spencer Critchley, at Huffington Post: Time after predictable time, Republicans roll out a new set of bogus talking points. And time after time, Democrats argue the facts — and lose. That’s got to change.

Here’s how the script goes:

Republican: I’d like to begin by making an outrageous assertion. It’s obviously false, but boy, is it ever intense.

Democrat: Why, that is clearly untrue! And here’s a list of reasons why…

Republican: Thanks for playing; this is going to be fun!

Just some of the many, many examples we could cite: Obama’s an African-born Muslim! Obamacare means death panels! The administration is full of Marxists! The New Black Panthers are coming! We could go on and on. Because these people are operating on a daily schedule, with hourly updates, 365 days a year. As Dan Pfeiffer, White House Communications Director told Vanity Fair’s Todd Purdum recently, “we live in a world where there are so many news cycles that there isn’t a news cycle anymore.”

And with every crazy new claim, if you’re a Democrat, your reaction is probably some version of, “What kind of idiot could believe this crap?” Then you start arguing with it.

And as soon as you do, you lose.

You see, the right wants you to debate stuff they know is untrue. If you win on the merits, and you probably will, they don’t care at all.

They only want two things: one, they want you — and the media — to repeat their talking points, because as we know, a lie repeated often enough starts to feel true. Two, they want you to debate those points. Because it means you’re debating on their terms — and because the sheer act of debating makes you look weak.

Let’s take these one at a time. First, how the right designs talking points that get lots and lots of repetition.

The key is to start with an image that excites intense emotion. You want an image that, once imagined, is very hard to get out of your head — it’s kind of like writing the hook to a pop song. You might choose death panels, Marxists, New Black Panthers, whatever. To make your talking point, simply associate that image with your target. NOTE: If this makes no sense at all, that’s actually better — outrageousness gives your talking point a big extra kick. Start it out on blogs and talk radio. Then put a fig leaf on it by getting it on Fox News. Now the legitimate media have an excuse to run it (and they most certainly will). The final payoff comes when Democrats debate it, thereby repeating it yet more.

Congratulations. You’ve gone viral.

Is this effective? We report, you decide: A recent NY Times/CBS poll shows that 20 percent of Americans think President Obama was born in another country. A Harris Poll finds that 57 percent of Republicans think he’s a Muslim. And 24 percent — one in four! — think he is the anti-Christ.

Now point number two: debate, in and of itself, looks weak. Think about high school for a minute: Who debates? That would be the glasses-wearing nerds of the Debate Club. Republicans, making their bold, false assertions, are the football players shoving those debaters into the lockers. Is this right? Wrong? Who cares? One side of this transaction is shoving, and the other is being shoved. Who looks like they’re in charge? All too often, Democrats are making excellent points, from inside a locker.

As Pfeiffer states, “cable news… doesn’t reward getting things done or working with someone across the aisle. It rewards the single most outrageous thing you possibly can [say].”

What to do? Should Democrats respond in kind? No, and yes. No, we should not start with our own outrageous lies. It would be yet another instance of allowing Republicans to set the terms and, need we say it, it would be wrong. But a big yes to getting better at using emotion.

In his campaign stump speeches, one of the most persuasive “points” Barack Obama made came when he would look off into the future and raise an arm towards it, while speaking in the rhythmic cadences of our greatest orators. He had solid ideas about how we would actually get to that future. But it was the gesture and the rhythm that made your heart rise.

Obama’s lack of interest in cable news sensationalism is a big part of why we supported him in the first place. He is not a talking point. But in order to raise the dialogue — to transcend the chatter — we need to use emotion to show truth. Throughout human history, we haven’t simply stated the results of heroic battles. We’ve sung them as epics. The Democrats have won some heroic battles on issues that matter to millions: health care, financial reform, the environment and more. We need to sing our epics.

Filed Under: Communication, Journalism, Politics & Society

Obama’s Credit Gap – Why the President’s Victories Go Unnoticed

August 1, 2010 by Spencer Critchley

By Zach Friend & Spencer Critchley, at Huffington Post: We knew this was coming. The media have finally noticed the gap between Barack Obama’s extraordinary achievements — health care reform, financial reform and preventing a depression, to name a very few — and his seeming inability to win credit for them. “Why can’t Obama get a break?” is the meme of the day.

Of course, the issue is not so much that the president can’t win credit, it’s that others, including the media, can’t give it to him. The loss of that distinction is in itself a sign of this disconnect.

As with any trend, there is no single cause for this one. Rather, multiple causes come together at the right time and reinforce each other.

Cause number one is simply the economy. Yes, we avoided total collapse. Yes, recovery looks to be well under way. But unemployment is still high, people are still scared and angry, and they blame the person in charge now, instead of those who actually caused the problem in the past.

The second cause is deeply ironic: Obama’s very strength, it turns out, can be a weakness. After his fast rise against enormous odds, many people actually seem to believe that he is superhuman – that he should be able instantly to unite the country, solve unemployment, end wars and terrorism and while he’s at it, fix health care and end pandemics. [Read more…] about Obama’s Credit Gap – Why the President’s Victories Go Unnoticed

Filed Under: Communication, Journalism, Politics & Society

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search This Site

Broadcast Appearances

Spencer Critchley on Spectrum News 1 LA

Book

Patriots of Two Nations by Spencer Critchley
Kindle & paperback at Amazon. Audio book at Audible. EPUB format here.

New Music: Jailbreak

Cover image for the song "Jailbreak:" a ruined motel by the side of a lonely desert road.

Podcast

Dastardly Cleverness in the Service of Good

Social Media

Substack

YouTube

Music: The Critchleys

The Critchleys: Owen and Spencer Critchley

About Me

Spencer Critchley

Jump to Recent Posts

New Music: The Desert Mothers

The True Crisis

Outside in the Rain

The Liberal Backbone

Slowly and then all at once

On the Podcast: A Letter to a Friend Voting for Trump

“The War of the Worldviews” at TedX Pugwash

Recent Comments

  • terry rankin on “The War of the Worldviews” at TedX Pugwash
  • Spencer Critchley on Why Biden was right to link MAGA, the Confederacy & the Axis in his SOTU address
  • Spencer Critchley on Why Biden was right to link MAGA, the Confederacy & the Axis in his SOTU address
  • Scott Sexton on Why Biden was right to link MAGA, the Confederacy & the Axis in his SOTU address
  • Anonymous on Why Biden was right to link MAGA, the Confederacy & the Axis in his SOTU address

Photos

Spencer Critchley on Fox News' Cavuto
Barack Obama photo by Spencer Critchley
Bruce Springsteen photo by Spencer Critchley
Jay-Z photo by Spencer Critchley
Tiny American flag in crowd at political rally
Director Elizabeth Thompson & Composer/Audio Producer Spencer Critchley with the Emmy for the PBS documentary "Blink."

Find more photos here.

Privacy Policy

Learn how this site collects information and how you can control that.

© 2005–2026 Spencer Critchley