• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Spencer Critchley

  • Home
  • About
  • Media Appearances
    • Broadcast Appearances
    • Print & Web Coverage
    • My Reporting & Commentary
    • Podcast
    • “Saving Democracy” Events
    • News: Real or Fake?
    • Hallmarks of a #BadArgument
  • Music
  • Photos
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

Donald Trump

I know it sounds insane, but Trump sure looks like a Russian agent

October 10, 2016 by Spencer Critchley

Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin photo from Wikimedia Commons

[Also published at Huffington Post.] One of the foundational ideas of artificial intelligence is the Turing Test, named for the brilliant Briton Alan Turing. According to the Test, if a computer can act enough like a human mind to fool an actual human, the computer can be said to have achieved human intelligence.

If we adapt the Turing Test for Russian agents, Donald Trump passes.

We don’t have direct knowledge that Trump is in fact a Russian agent, for now at least. But he acts so much like one that it’s impossible to tell the difference.

I know how crazy this sounds, and believe me, I am no fan of conspiracy theories. But the evidence keeps piling up.

At Monday night’s debate, Trump once again defended Russia against charges that it’s interfering in our election, like he did in the first debate, and at other times. In so doing, he argues against his own country’s intelligence services, which have unequivocally stated — including in briefings to Trump — that Russia is behind the hacking and disinformation we’ve been facing.

Trump defends Russia against criticism whenever he has the chance. He also frequently praises its dictatorial president, Vladimir Putin — a man who jails and kills political opponents — as a stronger leader than the democratically elected Barack Obama.

Until it became too awkward, Trump’s campaign manager was Paul Manafort, who enriched himself by consulting for the former Ukrainian prime minister, and Putin puppet, Viktor Yanukovych. While Manafort was still in charge of the Trump campaign, it removed a plank from the Republican platform that had called for arming the new Ukrainian government against Russian incursions.

Trump has also on the one hand denied that Russia has gone into Ukraine (to be fair, this might just have been stupidity), and on the other suggested the annexation of Crimea (part of Ukraine) might have been justified.

Trump’s position on NATO — that the U.S. shouldn’t protect allies unless they pay — might as well be custom-designed to advance Putin’s dream of weakening the alliance that has protected the West since World War II.

Trump has pursued and profited from multiple business dealings in Russia. According to comments by Donald Trump, Jr. in 2008: “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”

And now there’s this: Newsweek reporter Kurt Eichenwald has noticed that the Russian government appears to be feeding disinformation directly to Trump. At a rally today in Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, Trump read from a document that purports to prove a connection between Hillary Clinton and supposed perfidy in Benghazi, via an email Trump claimed was written by Clinton friend Sidney Blumenthal.

“He’s now admitting they could have done something about Benghazi,’’ Trump said, dropping the document to the floor. “This just came out a little while ago.”

The crowd booed and chanted, “Lock her up!”

The trouble is, Eichenwald knows the email is a fake, because it uses language misleadingly lifted from one of Eichenwald’s own Newsweek articles, in a form only ever published by the Russian government propaganda organ Sputnik:

This is not funny. It is terrifying. The Russians engage in a sloppy disinformation effort and, before the day is out, the Republican nominee for president is standing on a stage reciting the manufactured story as truth. How did this happen? Who in the Trump campaign was feeding him falsehoods straight from the Kremlin? (The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment).

The Russians have been obtaining American emails and now are presenting complete misrepresentations of them—falsifying them—in hopes of setting off a cascade of events that might change the outcome of the presidential election. The big question, of course, is why are the Russians working so hard to damage Clinton and, in the process, aid Donald Trump?

An agent is someone who acts on behalf of another. Possibly it’s unwitting, as so much of his behavior seems to be, but by his own words and deeds, Donald Trump is indistinguishable from an agent for Vladimir Putin‘s Russian Federation.

Filed Under: Politics & Society Tagged With: Donald Trump

Debunking The Media’s Top Excuse for Giving Trump Billions in Free Publicity

July 19, 2016 by Spencer Critchley

[Also published at Huffington Post.] He’s a genius at exploiting the media, if at nothing else: Donald Trump’s rise has been fueled by almost unbelievable amounts of free coverage — well over $2 billion worth so far.

Many have complained that this makes the media, hungry for Trump-driven ratings, complicit in the elevation of a dangerously unqualified reality show star to the near-summit of political power.

There’s standard media response, though: Trump gets more coverage simply because he’s more available. It was repeated Sunday by Face the Nation‘s John Dickerson in The New York Times Magazine:

If the others don’t want to talk, then that’s on them. In a lot of cases, Trump was the only one who would talk on any given Sunday. Talking to the press is not always good. Donald Trump seems to think it is, but most of his opponents didn’t. He was getting more airtime, but he was also the only one who was as available as he was.

Seems reasonable, and I accept that Dickerson, a fine journalist, believes it’s true.

But I think he’s kidding himself, along with all the others who make this claim.

I’ve helped book interviews for three presidential campaigns. I can tell you what happens — under normal circumstances — when one candidate is more available than another. That candidate gets turned away, in the name of media balance.

On the 2008 Obama campaign, for example, our interview-booking operation was far better than John McCain’s. Every day, we offered opportunities with the principals (the presidential and vice presidential candidates) and their spouses, and/or with high level surrogates, such as governors, members of Congress, and celebrities. We booked a lot of them, but we also were frequently told, “Sorry, we have to say no because the other side isn’t making anyone available, and we can’t look like we’re favoring you.”

That’s the normal state of affairs. What’s been happening with Trump is not normal.

And the only explanation that seems credible is the obvious one: Trump, thanks to his very outrageousness, is ratings gold. Turning him down would mean throwing away a fortune. Consider what he’s done for CNN:

When CNN President Jeff Zucker saw the ratings for Fox News’s first Republican debate last August — a staggering 24 million viewers — he immediately called up his head of advertising sales and told her to raise prices, by a lot…

Since the start of the year, when the primary season began in earnest, CNN’s prime-time audience has more than doubled to 435,000 viewers a night in its target demographic of 25- to 54-year-olds, according to Nielsen…

Mr. Zucker acknowledges that CNN has been criticized for the ample airtime it has devoted to Mr. Trump, but he dismisses most of that as coming from those who “just don’t like Donald Trump.”

“To his credit, he has been willing to submit to interviews, town halls, or whatever, in a way that I still don’t understand why many of the others weren’t willing to do,” he said.

I accept that Zucker believes this explanation just as much as CBS’s Dickerson does. But we’re talking about an industry where, in business terms, ratings are everything: deciding the fates of networks, and the careers of individual employees. Well-intentioned people can lose site of what’s really going on, even when — or especially when — they’re surrounded by the evidence.

They’re like the young fish in the parable: An old fish swims up to them and asks, “How’s the water?”

“What’s water?” they reply.

 

Filed Under: Journalism, Politics & Society Tagged With: Donald Trump

A Year of Trump: Awful at the Start, Worse Now

June 14, 2016 by Spencer Critchley

Donald Trump photo by Gage Skidmore via voter.com, Creative Commons licenseThe other day I realized that I’m coming up on a year of writing about Donald Trump:

His ignorance, racism, his narcissism, and — perhaps explaining it all — his disturbingly baby-like mouth.

Here’s the collection (so far) at the Huffington Post:

Here’s How Wrong Trump Is: Immigrants Commit Less Crime
7/7/2015

Trump Has Exposed GOP Racism
7/13/2015

Scarborough: A ‘Generational Opportunity’ to Reform the GOP by Fighting Trump
7/14/2015

The Real Reason Fox News Is Going After Trump
Aug 10, 2015

If Trump’s as Smart as He Says, He’ll Withdraw Now — Here’s Why
9/21/2015

Bigots Aren’t Ashamed of Being Bigots, But Why Aren’t They Ashamed of Being Cowards?12/9/2015

Who Says Trump Is Smart?
12/14/2015

Suicide Mission: In Embracing Trump, the GOP May Finally Stop Him — And Destroy Itself
2/1/2016

The Sweet Smell of Trump
3/14/2016

Baby Donald Just Needs His Bottle
6/3/2016

Filed Under: Politics & Society Tagged With: #BabyDonald, Donald Trump

Baby Donald Just Needs His Bottle

June 14, 2016 by Spencer Critchley

[Also published at Huffington Post.] Just look at his mouth.

Donald Trump photo by Michael Vadon

It’s the mouth of a hungry baby, lips permanently pursed for a nipple.

Now look at his hands. See how they flail about — they’re not just the size of baby hands, they move like the hands of a baby in distress.

Back to the face. Flushed, yelling, eyes screwed shut.

A hungry, hungry baby.

Experts aren’t sure exactly what causes narcissistic personality disorder. WebMD says:

Parents who put their children on a pedestal and shower them with endless praise can plant a seed of narcissism, a recent study found…

Then again, the opposite is true, too. Children who are ignored or abused tend to be self-centered almost as a survival instinct.

Whether, as an actual baby, Donald Trump got too much nursing, or not enough, we can’t know. But in grownup Baby Donald, we see the symptoms all too well. As a textbook case of narcissistic personality disorder, Baby Donald will:

Think about himself most of the time and talk about himself a lot
Crave attention and admiration
Exaggerate his talents and achievements
Believe he’s special
Set unrealistic goals
Have wide, fast mood swings
Have a hard time taking others’ feelings seriously
Strive to win, whatever it takes
Fantasize about unlimited success, money, and power.

We don’t have to give him the presidency.

Just give him his bottle.

Image credit: Michael Vadon (CC BY-SA 2.0).

Filed Under: Politics & Society Tagged With: #BabyDonald, Donald Trump

The Sweet Smell of Trump

March 14, 2016 by Spencer Critchley

[Also published at Huffington Post.] Con artist. Demagogue. And yes, in many ways, a fascist.

It can seem incredible that such a man is the front-runner for one of our two major parties.

But as shocking as Donald Trump may be, we’ve seen his type before. The trouble is, we Americans forget our history — and that enables his rise.

Back in the 1930’s, there was Father Charles Coughlin. A Canadian-born Catholic priest, Coughlin started out as a progressive who supported FDR’s New Deal, before using his nationwide radio program and magazine to promote anti-semitism, Mussolini, Hitler and, like all such people, himself, above all.

In the 50’s, we had Senator Joe McCarthy, who built his power by whipping up mass hysteria about communists and homosexuals supposedly subverting the U.S. government and army.

By 1957, the toxic mixture of celebrity, fear-mongering, hatred and phony patriotism — which shocks us so in Trump — was already familiar. Familiar enough to shape the plot of a Hollywood classic, “The Sweet Smell of Success.”

“Success” tells the story of an unprincipled, self-aggrandizing gossip columnist and power broker named J.J. Hunsecker, a character based on the real life Walter Winchell.

Check out this scene, with Burt Lancaster as Hunsecker and Tony Curtis as press agent Sidney Falco. Witness Hunsecker’s greed, dishonesty, violence and narcissistic identification of himself with the nation — and just try not to think of Donald J. Trump.

Filed Under: Politics & Society Tagged With: Donald Trump

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search This Site

Broadcast Appearances

Spencer Critchley on Spectrum News 1 LA

Book

Patriots of Two Nations by Spencer Critchley
Kindle & paperback at Amazon. Audio book at Audible. EPUB format here.

New Music: Jailbreak

Cover image for the song "Jailbreak:" a ruined motel by the side of a lonely desert road.

Podcast

Dastardly Cleverness in the Service of Good

Social Media

Substack

YouTube

Music: The Critchleys

The Critchleys: Owen and Spencer Critchley

About Me

Spencer Critchley

Jump to Recent Posts

New Music: The Desert Mothers

The True Crisis

Outside in the Rain

The Liberal Backbone

Slowly and then all at once

On the Podcast: A Letter to a Friend Voting for Trump

“The War of the Worldviews” at TedX Pugwash

Recent Comments

  • terry rankin on “The War of the Worldviews” at TedX Pugwash
  • Spencer Critchley on Why Biden was right to link MAGA, the Confederacy & the Axis in his SOTU address
  • Spencer Critchley on Why Biden was right to link MAGA, the Confederacy & the Axis in his SOTU address
  • Scott Sexton on Why Biden was right to link MAGA, the Confederacy & the Axis in his SOTU address
  • Anonymous on Why Biden was right to link MAGA, the Confederacy & the Axis in his SOTU address

Photos

Spencer Critchley on Fox News' Cavuto
Barack Obama photo by Spencer Critchley
Bruce Springsteen photo by Spencer Critchley
Jay-Z photo by Spencer Critchley
Tiny American flag in crowd at political rally
Director Elizabeth Thompson & Composer/Audio Producer Spencer Critchley with the Emmy for the PBS documentary "Blink."

Find more photos here.

Privacy Policy

Learn how this site collects information and how you can control that.

© 2005–2026 Spencer Critchley